PDA

View Full Version : Poseidon (2006) - Review Thread


myword
05-11-2006, 04:16 AM
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/7416/poseidononesheet2qw.th.jpg (http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=poseidononesheet2qw.jpg)

Title: Poseidon (2006)
Directed By: Wolfgang Petersen
Written By: Mark Protosevich
Starring: Josh Lucas, Kurt Russell, Richard Dreyfuss, Emmy Rossum

Reviewed By Sarhan "Tsar" Rashid aka My Word

My first encounter with “The Poseidon Adventure” (the original 1972 original starring Gene Hackman and Ernest Borgnine) was purely out of coincidence. I was home alone one night with nothing to do. My only form of entertainment in those days was the idiot box and so here I was flipping channels until an image captured my imagination.

I’d love to say it was a capsized cruise liner but instead it was a very attractive woman in a revealing (at that time) evening gown. Hey, I was a young boy with raging testosterones so don’t shoot me that dirty look! What began as cheap thrill soon gripped me. I wanted to know what would happen to these characters, what obstacles would be thrown at them and how would they survive them.

I guess that’s why my expectations for this remake weren’t all that high when I initially learnt it was going to be made.

I like the work of Wolfgang Petersen ("Outbreak", "Air Force One", "The Perfect Storm"). He’s what I like to call a balanced filmmaker. One who delivers a solid product for the studio and audiences alike. And he succeeds at it once again.

I don’t blame him for the lackluster “Troy”. I think it suffered from having an ambitious story marred by a lack of an epic scope. The idea is again put to test here by writer Mark Protosevich ("The Cell") and surprisingly works pretty effectively.

One major grouse I’ve read in many reviews has been the lack of exposition required for an audience to invest in these characters but I feel the opposite is true. We, the audience, aren’t spoon fed unnecessary details about these characters. Instead we're expected to connect the dots after a brief introduction to each one of the central characters. It's really not difficult to assume, for example, the kind of relationship Robert Ramsey (Kurt Russell) and his daughter Jennifer Ramsey (Emmy Rossum) share. Through the duration the screenwriter cleverly incorporates more details to help etch out each individual. It worked fine and helped keep the running from being excessively long.

It’s not to say the movie is perfect in any shape or form. For a movie like this to truly grip a viewer it has to have its share of unexpected fatalities. I had hopes for it after the first character death but thereafter it became a pretty much a by-the-numbers affair. They had at ample opportunity for this but needless to say each time they decided to take the safer (and more predictable) route.

Besides a solitary jarring and poorly edited scene midway (probably to avoid a longer running time) the movie is technically efficient. The special effects and sets are first rate and the performers aren’t far behind. Although they don’t get much to do other than go from an expression of worry to panic to worry again they each breathe life into their characters.

I still prefer the original but the remake isn’t without its merits. It knows its target audience and caters to them without alienating other viewers. Sure it isn't sophisticated or offer anything we haven't seen in this genre but it provides good entertainment and isn't that what summer movies are about?

“M:I:III” might have officially launched the summer movie season but it’s “Poseidon” which does it in much more fitting fashion.

Official Website - http://www2.warnerbros.com/poseidon/z
IMDB “The Poseidon Adventure” Page - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069113/
IMDB “Poseidon” Page - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409182/

Andrey83
05-11-2006, 04:46 AM
So, good but not great.

Do you think this movie will bring Kurt Russell back on track? I like him, but its been a while since i saw him on the big screen.

myword
05-11-2006, 11:17 AM
So, good but not great.

Do you think this movie will bring Kurt Russell back on track? I like him, but its been a while since i saw him on the big screen.

I really don't know how to answer that. To me Kurt Russell has always picked interesting movies/characters but wasn't ever high on the visibility radar so I don't know how this question applies when he never really went off track (in my opinion).

Andrey83
05-11-2006, 07:24 PM
I didnt meen he ever was like Brad Pitt or something. But he sure used to be higher up then he is now.

Stargate, Tombstone, Backdraft, Big Trubble and Escape from New York was all in the spotlight and had Kurt Russel in the lead. Thats more then I can say for him now ;)

Edit: Forgot to say, thanks for the review :)

sshuttari
05-12-2006, 12:33 PM
im going to see this today at IMAX

hopefully it will be a good popcorn flick

Dogbert0228
05-12-2006, 04:17 PM
Kurt Russel made his mark again with Miracle, I thought. Very powerful acting, and he did a great tribute to Herb Brooks in the way he played him.

quiksilver022
05-12-2006, 08:24 PM
This looks as fluffly as summer movies get, but that probably won't stop me from seeing it in IMAX. Honestly, from what I've read, the only good thing is the special effects, and the dialogue is horrendous, but it's summertime.. And the movies that are coming out are made strictly to turn your brain to tapioca as you kick it back and just enjoy the ride.

PsYkOoOoO
05-12-2006, 10:46 PM
You know when you are watching a disaster movie when the dialogue is dominated by stuff like "Dont let go!" or "Hold on!" or "Come on!"...or anything along that line.

And this movie has a bunch of those.

FilmJerk
05-13-2006, 12:38 AM
this movie is the defenition of "cliche". Those you expect to live, live, and those you expect to die, die. and theres the arrogant ******* who always gets whats coming. and of course the dumb little kid who seems to get into places or get lost for no reason. and of course everyone, even the kid seem to be able to hold their breaths for minutes, except for Kurt Russells drowning, other than the nice visuals, this movie sucked

ddel54
05-13-2006, 03:24 PM
I thought the movie was alright.....Of course the Original was a lot better....but yea I didn't even know it was gonna be that short of a movie untill I check the times of the movie....But i don't know how to put up spolier tags so i won't write some of the stuff that i wanna write....But those of u that wanna see this in Imax I wouldn't waste my money on it...I rather wait for a movie that would be a lot better

Glordreen
05-13-2006, 07:44 PM
I thought it was a decent popcorn flick. entertaining.

In the original did Kurt Russel's character live? I thought I saw someone say 7 people lived in the original, but only 6 lived in this.

7.5/10

Ramplate
05-13-2006, 07:57 PM
I thought it was a decent popcorn flick. entertaining.

In the original did Kurt Russel's character live? I thought I saw someone say 7 people lived in the original, but only 6 lived in this.

7.5/10

there is no comparison to the original characters. They all have different names in this film

FilmJerk
05-13-2006, 08:37 PM
gonna be another lackluster opening for a big budget movie. I think this will barely open in the 20 mil mark

Tolkien
05-14-2006, 02:24 AM
I didn't bother to see this one.

I mean, not because I thought it'd be **** or anything, but just because I've seen the original already. I already know what happened to everyone. Boat flips over, hundreds die, a few lucky ones survive. End of story. I've wasted money before and hell I do everyday, but that doesn't mean I'm going to spend $6.00 for a movie ticket just to see a cool five minute CGI scene where the boat flips over. lmmfao. On another note, the original movie was "da" bomb, where as this one might just be "the" bomb.

Brenzi51
05-14-2006, 10:50 AM
I didn't bother to see this one.

I mean, not because I thought it'd be **** or anything, but just because I've seen the original already. I already know what happened to everyone. Boat flips over, hundreds die, a few lucky ones survive. End of story. I've wasted money before and hell I do everyday, but that doesn't mean I'm going to spend $6.00 for a movie ticket just to see a cool five minute CGI scene where the boat flips over. lmmfao. On another note, the original movie was "da" bomb, where as this one might just be "the" bomb.

WOW...$6.00 for a movie ticket?!

sshuttari
05-14-2006, 12:42 PM
8dollars for me sigh

Tolkien
05-14-2006, 03:02 PM
WOW...$6.00 for a movie ticket?!


... $7.50 if it's after 4pm.

neo5595
05-14-2006, 04:17 PM
$9 for me :(

ILOVEKATIE
05-14-2006, 05:11 PM
I felt the film was a bit rushed, there wasn't any build up to the whole wave/turning over the ship scene, it just happened, but whatever.
Even though the effects and sequence of the wave turning over the ship was impressive, the film overall didn't wow me.

straightupridah
05-14-2006, 08:06 PM
this movie is the defenition of "cliche". Those you expect to live, live, and those you expect to die, die. and theres the arrogant ******* who always gets whats coming. and of course the dumb little kid who seems to get into places or get lost for no reason. and of course everyone, even the kid seem to be able to hold their breaths for minutes, except for Kurt Russells drowning, other than the nice visuals, this movie sucked


I COULD NOT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF! This movie was crap. Worse than I had expected.

ComedyMan90
05-14-2006, 08:39 PM
6/10

Wasn't great but wasn't awful. Only reason it is a 6 instead of a 5 is because some special effects scenes were worthwhile.

carnage4u
05-15-2006, 07:45 AM
it was a fun movie. thats about it.

sec127
05-15-2006, 08:08 AM
Me and my sister laughed constantly though "Poseidon". It was so silly and the acting was so bad! But thats why I enjoyed it. It was just a goofy disaster filck, like the ones from the 70s. Yes, it was a but rushed and I think it would have been better if there was more charecter development and set up tp the wave. But whatever, the visuals were great the acting was bad and the whole thing was fun, what else do you want from a disaster movie!?

hammerhedd11
05-15-2006, 07:55 PM
I think this shoulda got the King Kong (2005) treatment. An hour for character development, then the rest is full of action and you actually care for the characters when they die. Ya, Peter Jackson should make every movie.LOL:D