PDA

View Full Version : FX Overkill ?


todd philip
05-12-2004, 01:12 AM
Look i really love the mummy movies, and every other stephen sommers movies, but van helsing was just TOO DAMN MUCH FX? do you agree?

WDTSF
05-12-2004, 01:15 AM
*edit*

MagsXGill29
05-12-2004, 05:52 AM
well, for a horror/scifi movie, what do you expect. It's not like you can go out and live right on location, with real werewolves ?

Sock-Man
05-12-2004, 06:23 AM
Yeah there was way too much special effects in this movie. Fair enough with the monsters, but it seemed every 2 seconds something else was blowing up or there was some ridiculously elaborate set piece for the characters to prat around in.

rayzor09
05-12-2004, 06:52 PM
mags has a point... butyou could use costumes and animatronics.

MagsXGill29
05-12-2004, 07:35 PM
an animatronic werewolf ? That would look ever worse. Fur would be hard to get to look real.

rayzor09
05-12-2004, 09:15 PM
or a COSTUME

todd philip
05-13-2004, 12:14 AM
Originally posted by rayzor09
or a COSTUME custome would of been better then just pure cgi!

dustindame
05-13-2004, 10:32 AM
there was to much.

cerealkiller182
05-13-2004, 02:46 PM
there was way to much fx. when van helsing jumped from horse to horse trying to get back to the wagon, that could have been done with a stuntman. They've been doin that stuff for years. Also, did we really have to see the electricity inside frankenstein's head. That was a little stupid. Overall the monsters were pretty good, they flowed together with the rest of the film well.

Inval1d
05-14-2004, 07:31 PM
the CGI and FX in VH were actually better looking than in the trailer. the trailer really made it look bad.

Boods
05-15-2004, 03:03 PM
no i think its fine

true fan11212
05-16-2004, 04:33 PM
For me, the fact that there were alot of VFX didn't bother me, but that they looked completely fake was the problem. I like CGI, unlike most, but it was just poorly done in VH.

redorangeflower
05-19-2004, 04:12 PM
yes! way too many special effects in movies, Van Helsing was so overdone, no story what so ever!

droidguy1119
05-19-2004, 04:17 PM
:rolleyes:

I dunno, I'm just getting tired of this discussion, because there's no point. The movie industry is not going to slow down their FX habit.

It has become cheaper to use effects. Also, a lot of what you might think is CGI is not, really -- for instance, say, Lord of the Rings, while almost all of the battling was CGI, very few of the backgrounds were. Underground and aboveground Isengard, the giant stairs, Mordor, the Black Gates, Minas Tirith, and Fangorn Forest, for example, are all models and not CGI.

redorangeflower
05-19-2004, 04:27 PM
yes WAY too many special effetc. I do not mind if it is a good story, but when the story is scarificed for the lure of big effects then we all loose out as movie watchers!

Andrey83
05-20-2004, 04:18 PM
Then dont watch it.....I dont see the problem here.....

Alien
05-21-2004, 10:33 AM
It wasn't over kill of FX just over kill of bad FX.

PsYkOoOoO
05-21-2004, 11:00 AM
Too much effects is fine.

But,too many lousy effects.Thats a pain in the ass.

Andrey83
05-21-2004, 11:20 AM
^^ agree!

Some movies just need to have effects. But they have to be good to be enjoyable....